Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudio Loureiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Claudio Loureiro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If you remove the useless parts, the only actual content is "this guy associate produced a film, and is the ceo of an ad agency in brazil". The company may or may not be significant, but this guy probably isnt. Benboy00 (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: I removed a bit of content and fixed several format errors, I think the Brazilian press supports his notability, it just needs additional work. Cristano mussli (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: I added more sources. I believe he is notable, but the page wasn't well written initially. I think it looks good now, but I will keep looking to see if there is more room for improvement. PicardJ (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  19:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for now as although I'm not a Portuguese speaker, it seems here and News both have an acceptable amount of results so I presume this article is at an acceptable level as well. SwisterTwister   talk  22:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.