Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudio R. Ochoa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 13:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Claudio R. Ochoa

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no references to indicate subject is notable or even exists --Bwiki 15:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Detailed rationale/research:

The article is about someone who is allegedly the grandson of Fabio Ochoa Restrepo and the (estranged) nephew of the Ochoa brothers. There is no indication that the subject of this article ever had anything to do with their activities (if he exists at all), so I don't see how he could possibly meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria. More specifically, he doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria regarding the notability of persons.

As it stands, the article is also in breach of Wikipedia's verifiability policy. The external link provided in the article does not contain anything about a daughter/sister who severed ties with the Ochoa familiy (as suggested in the article), nor about anybody called Claudio. A Google search for the phrase "Claudio Restrepo Ochoa" (include quotation marks to get those three words only in that specific order) returns no hits at all, and a search for "Claudio R. Ochoa" returns only links to Wikipedia, Wikipedia mirrors, a "Fundrace" website entry on a Washington, DC law student, and a Spanish-language scientific paper on maize by an agricultural engineer by that name.

--Bwiki 15:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: per G7, no assertion of notability.  Ravenswing  15:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy as A7 no notability asserted. Simply being related to notable people is not enough in the absense of independent coverage.  Eluchil404 20:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.