Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claus, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  01:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Claus, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

And another siding that apparently has always existed to service an ag supply business, as it still does. Not a settlement. Mangoe (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - As with all of these articles by the same editor, WP:GEOLAND is failed. Worth noting that the additional California placenames reference cited here does not actually say what Claus is - it says it was established by the railway, so a natural interpretation would be that it is a railway siding/station. The other reference is GNIS, which has known problems with accuracy. FOARP (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO.  // Timothy ::  talk  16:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.