Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clawdeen Wolf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected as a sock-created article by. No point in keeping this open any more. ansh 666 07:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Clawdeen Wolf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a unsourced broken article about a main character in a doll frachise. Fine with a redirect to Monster High. z' L3X1 (distænt write)  23:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC) 16:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  23:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect Per nom.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - nom is providing an IDONTLIKEIT rationale. This media property has video and novels, and a simple BEFORE shows serious independent secondary sources discussing the character (one of the defining characters in the property) in at least three languages - not fan material or in-universe discussion, but actual analysis of social impact. This is not, per policy, the place to discuss the existing article: AfD is not cleanup. Newimpartial (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Article is fancruft, and was created by a sock operator who has demonstrated poor judgment and low editing competence over the years. If she had created this from scratch again, it would have been speedied under WP:G5. That said, Redirect is how we normally deal with her. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I assume you're talking about the 3 HuffPost articles? L3X1 (distænt write)  16:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm fine with the redirect, but the relevant argument is the sockpuppetry not notability. And I was referring above to the many mentions in books and academic articles not Huffpo. Newimpartial (talk) 16:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Redirect to List of Monster High characters this was re-created as an article by a LTA sockpuppet. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.