Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clay animation (list of examples)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Clay animation (list of examples)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An unreferenced list of multiple non-notable television shows, etc. Most of them are from one studio or another, and would probably be better off in a filmography and/or category. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, but trim down to notable entries (wikilinked title or studio).--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: There is already a category as well, Category:Clay animation television series and films. IF all the non-wikilinked things were removed, it would still be no good reason not to delete the article entirely in favor of the category.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The list can be sorted by year, name, or studio -- the category doesn't have that capability.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reason why this article was originally created (by yours truly): Avoiding unnecessary clutter in the Clay animation article itself. Now, editors intent on adding an example will contribute here, not in the main article. This article can be trimmed whenever necessary. If this one is deleted, we'll have the clutter back in the main article. Q.E.D. ;-) --Janke | Talk 18:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Clay animation is certainly a notable topic. As for the category existing, that in and of itself is not a reason to delete a notable list. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but trim it to the more notable entries, and even trim the notable entries as well. Carpet Crawler  message me  19:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.