Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claydon Heeley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Claydon Heeley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nominate for deletion Can find nothing to prove WP:NOTABILITY in article or Google. Has been tagged as of dubious notability for 4 years. Edit history suggests coi and reads like an advert, even after editing. Boleyn (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominaton Johnclean184 (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - as suggested by nominator. A minor company that does not meet WP:CORP requirements. --Noleander (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing inherently notable about this company. 11coolguy12 (talk) 06:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable unreferenced article. SL93 (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Missing notability and reliable sources.  Alex discussion ★ 22:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.