Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Crooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 11:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Clayton Crooks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article relies almost entirely on primary and unreliable sources (blogs). No hits in a search of major contemporary tech websites. czar 05:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  czar  23:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  23:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now unfortunately as none of the listed coverage suggests even minimally better applicable notability. Draft and userfy if ever needed, SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Not covered in any gaming sources that I can tell. For the angle of WP:AUTHOR, I tried to see if I could find any reviews or particulars on his books, but did not come across anything (Maybe to be expected as technical books). -- ferret (talk) 22:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.