Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Davis (critic) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Clayton Davis (critic)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability. No references to reliable sources have been added to the article, and I don't see that there's anything of susbtance about him online. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  22:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  22:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  22:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of this suggests better for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  22:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see no evidence that this critic is notable.  He's sometimes quoted in reliable sources (,, , and ), but we still don't know any biographical details about him. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only does article show no claim to notability, neither do sources NinjaRobotPirate found nor anything I can find. For a critic to be notable, there would have to be sources discussing his work as a critic.E.M.Gregory (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.