Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Latham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Clayton Latham

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was posted here with nothing more in the AFD page than "No References, Self promotion, not note worthy living bio" by User:NativeTexan55. I'm finishing the AFD for 2 and this nom does not constitute my !vote.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 04:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A cursory search on Google turns up nothing that would make him pass WP:ATHLETE. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Switch to keep per Eastmain's findings. Good enough.  I am not withdrawing the AFD, though, in deference to the person who posted it initially. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Holding a national record is sufficient to establish notability. Participating in the 2009 World Championships in Athletics is participating at the highest level, comparable to the Olympics, and is also sufficient to establish notability. I added a reference from the International Association of Athletics Federations as verification. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Eastmain - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. As above, not a great article, but his achievements certainly satisfy the criteria. Fol de rol troll (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.