Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clea Rose case

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, which defaults to KEEP Paul August &#9742; 04:33, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Clea Rose case
Finishing an incomplete nomination. I also think it should be deleted, people get run over everyday.--nixie 10:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Keep if this is the Clea Rose page. Capitalistroadster 02:55, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think the article was originally created as a memorial, which justified the initial delete tag. However, it has been fixed, to cover the controversy/issue surrounding police which which has already been noted in the national media.  --rob 10:59, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment We also have a Clea Rose article referring to the same thing so I would vote merge. This case has had considerable publicity in Canberra, the capital city of Australia. There is concern about possible police involvement in the chase and the failure of security cameras in Civic (the CBD). A 15-year-old who was driving the stolen vehicle that killed her is facing manslaughter charges. Capitalistroadster 11:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Reply: That's just a re-direct, there's no duplication.  --rob 11:38, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment This was not an incomplete nomination. The page was moved from Clea Rose to Clea Rose case. A merge may be needed between this page and Articles for deletion/Clea Rose. --Scott Davis Talk 13:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and, if it is proven that this case is a landmark case instead of yet another death in the world, rewrite the article. Until then, strong delete. --Mecanismo 17:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. We already had this debate. Sdedeo 18:21, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable for media coverage. Kappa 18:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a news item, not an encyclopedia article.  We have dozens of cases or more like this every year in the U.S. Quale 21:18, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm not sure why this was re-nominated given that there was a discussion at Articles for deletion/Clea Rose which appeared to result in a consensus to keep the article. I voted keep there based on the partial rewrite and name move, meant to change it from a bio of a NN person to an article about the case. MCB 23:39, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I closed/archived the discussion on the old page and pointed it here. (Not normally done by a participant but I broke it so I'll fix it.) At this point I've said my piece and will leave it to others to reach consensus and close this one. MCB 00:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same reasons as the old page. --best, kevin  · · · Kzollman | Talk · · · 01:18, September 8, 2005 (UTC)


 * Redundant, delete then merge with Clea Rose--Wikiwarrior 02:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, that page is a redirect to this one. MCB 07:20, 8 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep no change of opinion from other page
 * Delete Maybe a call later on for a reference in a Wikipedia article relating to Road Safety Issues in Australia, but of little signficance as a stand alone article --bacco007 07:41, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.