Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean Energy Experts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Clean Energy Experts

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Looks like ad to me, but not fully sure. Schuhpuppe (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC) This is not a spam ad. Two entries were made for Clean Energy Experts. One under "Clean Energy Experts" and one under "Clean Energy Experts, LLC." As creator of both, I wanted to delete the "Clean Energy Experts, LLC" entry but could not figure out how so I created the "Clean Energy Experts" entry. The company is based on Los Angeles and the corporate EIN is 27-0156055. If anything, please delete the "Clean Energy Experts, LLC" entry. Feel free to email me with any questions or concerns regarding this posting and I will answer then ASAP. Thank you. Lajollanorris  20:45, 16 June 2010
 * Delete, spam. Nakon  20:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Listed MyEnergySolution.com, same company. Nakon  20:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, recently formed enterprise with nothing in either article to suggest it might meet WP:COMPANY or WP:WEB. Could probably be speedied under A7. Cassandra 73 (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: entry revised to include 3rd party sources, Lajollanorris   22:25, 16 June 2010
 * Only one source was added to both articles, a link to a seminar one of the founders was speaking at. Cassandra 73 (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: MultiFamilyPro is a great, high profile seminar series. Wiki needs material on small enterprise companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazybo (talk • contribs) 21:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * User has not edited outside of the article nominated in this AFD. Nakon  22:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Additional 3rd party link included, Lajollanorris   23:56, 16 June 2010
 * You've already !voted "keep" above. Nakon  22:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, looks like it was created by one of the people (Norris) in the company. Sea photo Talk  05:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I consider this a candidate for speedy delete, first as A7 for no indication of notability, and possibly also G11, entirely promotional.   DGG ( talk ) 08:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable company. The references given are either primary sources or references in passing. Nothing is actually about the company itself, so all that has been established is its existence, not its notability. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. When the text is this spammy, notability is not an issue: The goal of Clean Energy Experts is to accelerate the adoption of cost-effective environmentally beneficial energy solutions.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.