Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean Energy for a Healthy Arizona Committee (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Except for article creator, everyone agrees to delete it without a clear agreement on a merge. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Clean Energy for a Healthy Arizona Committee
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NORG. This org was set up to pass Prop 127 in the 2018 elections and has had no significant, lasting impact. The proposition failed, and doesn't have its own Wiki article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and my search that also failed to identify additional sourcing. Star   Mississippi  17:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I refuse to !vote on an AfD for an article I mainly wrote, but my thoughts on this are as follows. There are at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that are primarily about the PAC:, , and . This establishes notability per WP:NORG. HouseBlastertalk 17:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge I don't see that any of those three sources are significant coverage. Two are mostly about the initiative and just mention the PAC. The third is about the filing issue. This is not enough for GNG. The lead really only has one sentences about the organization, the rest is about the proposition it was advocating. Merge and Redirect to Arizona Proposition 127 which does cover the initiative. MB 19:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete neither the PAC nor the committee is significant individually and thinking ofthem collectively still does not give the basis for an article.  DGG ( talk ) 01:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Arizona House Bill 2005, per arguments above that the PAC was only formed for this particular initiative. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  20:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.