Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean Green Cayo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. L Faraone  23:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Clean Green Cayo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no coverage for this environmental project. This was done by a youth service. SL93 (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - A laudable initiative but does not meet the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia as there is no coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * In the past, we usually have deleted smaller Rotary International, Rotaract, and Oddfellows clubs and projects, sometimes merging them into the larger articles. See, for example, Articles for deletion/Rotaract Club of Manila (redirect), and Articles for deletion/Independent Order of Odd Fellows Philippines (2nd nomination) (merge), compared with deletions after discussion at Articles for deletion/The Rotary Club of Milton, Articles for deletion/Rotary Club of Coimbatore Downtown, Articles for deletion/Rotary Club of Pensacola Suburban West, and Articles for deletion/Rotary Club of New York at the United Nations. I prefer to merger in this case, to preserve the editing history, but a simple redirect is cheap and easy. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't be against merging then. SL93 (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.