Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearDB Documenter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

ClearDB Documenter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence this software is notable. Lack of any references to independent reliable sources. I looked for references myself in Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, could find nothing. Most of what a web search turns up is just the vendor's own website, also some hits on sites with low threshold for inclusion (such as download.cnet.com and software.informer.com) and some reseller websites (componentsource.com), but nothing which is high quality and independent of the vendor to indicate that this software is notable. SJK (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SJK (talk) 09:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Answer: Thank you for bringing this up. I am working on the issues in the ClearDB Documenter article and will consider all your remarks. Scott tiger 2002 (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 06:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download sites and incidental mentions, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA who has added info on several Conquest Software Solutions products, so likely promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.