Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear rolling papers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to Rolling papers. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Clear rolling papers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a coatrack article being used to tarnish the reputation of another company, purporting a "controversy" when in fact none of this has received any kind of third party coverage at all (from reliable sources). coccyx bloccyx (toccyx)  21:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Apart from above (which I agree with), surely any information about clear rolling papers belongs in the article about Rolling papers. Don't see anything in this article worth merging, so Delete . Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Still, if info about this belongs in rolling papers then why do you propose deletion rather than redirection? - Mgm|(talk) 23:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I'd forgotten about that option. Redirect then. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Also see Articles for deletion/Transparent cigarette rolling papers which I closed earlier today. - Mgm|(talk) 23:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it were reliably sourced I suppose I could support a merge, but this is NOT reliably sourced.  JBsupreme (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.