Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearly Kombucha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Clearly Kombucha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obvious advertisement brochure for the product, including unsourced "product line up" that is something straight out of their website. Per WP:PROMO Wikipedia is not a proxy website for products or companies. Sources are mostly SPS or low quality blogs. There is one bit of substantial content about the trademark infringement but that is more about the company than the product, and wasn't important law. Jytdog (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOT advertising. (note creator User:AddledAdult also created similar ad The Rare Barrel editing as an individual (rather than their former WMF employee account). Widefox ; talk 13:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article looks like an advertisement and the sources are weak. Bmbaker88 (talk) 21:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Referenced primarily by press releases, industry blogs and the company website. The one potentially reliable source only mentioned the product in passing, along with others. Not enough to support notability, aside from the promotional concerns already raised. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Obvious advertising is obvious. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant reliable coverage. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.