Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearview (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Clearview (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not meet notability guidelines for music. Okamialvis (talk) 17:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect and not delete, until more third-party sources and coverage can be found. As I say all the time when notified of these, I think editors should send the nomination for deletion to the creator of the content (, in this case), not just the redirect. These pages just end up being recreated as a redirect all the time if they are actually deleted, and so therefore if it truly fails WP:NALBUMS it should be turned back into a redirect.  Ss 112  17:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. If an album by a notable artist may not meet the notability guideline, the thing to do is to look for sources to determine whether or not it does, and if it doesn't, merge it to the article on the artist, not start an AfD. --Michig (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant review by Sputnik is enough to demonstrate notability in independent sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.