Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleavage (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Cleavage (video game)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I nominated this article for deletion a few months ago for deletion (when it was still at Cleavage (Hentai)), but no consensus was reached. Hopefully, we can have a proper discussion this time. Yes there's a Mania.com review in the article, as well as mention by Anime News Network that it has been licensed. Despite this, I'm not sure if this will be enough to establish notability. If this discussion doesn't reach any consensus like last time, we might have to request a soft delete unless more sources are found, which in that case I'll happily withdraw this nomination. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Where was the past discussion had? Also, why was it redirected?  The article is about the game as well as the cartoons.  It should've been left at Cleavage (hentai).   D r e a m Focus  07:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see above. There's a link to this article's previous AfD discussion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * It was moved to Cleavage (H-game) shortly after the first AfD because it is common practice to disambiguate articles like this one based on its original release (ie. Bleach (manga), in this case the video game. However, Naming conventions (video games) states that the correct disambiguation for video game articles is (video game), so I moved it per that guideline. (Hentai) is, as of yet, not an accepted method to disambiguate between articles. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not finding any other reliable third-party sources beyond than Mania.com review for either the video game or the anime OVA for it to pass WP:NOTE. But given the name of the game, positive hits are hard to come by. While there is another review linked in the external links section, that appears to be a relatively new website with only a couple dozen reviews, basic Joomla template, and no indications that the website meets the requirements of WP:SPS. What I wonder is how did someone find that link because I cannot find it listed in the list of reviews. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Zero of the 6 sources appear wp:notability-suitable. Article text looks like self-written descriptive and promotional material. North8000 (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.