Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clement Richardson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Nomination withdrawn. Could have fallen under WP:Snow as keep. (non-admin closure) Meanderingbartender (talk) 10:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Clement Richardson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:ANYBIO as well as WP:NAUTHOR. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:Notability (academics) is more to the point, and Richardson seems to be supported by that. In any event, as the president of a university he must have received plenty of significant coverage to comply with the WP:GNG. Moonraker (talk) 14:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NPROF#6 as the president of a major college. That alone should be enough. --hroest 15:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NPROF as noted in the other two keeps. Also, the article has been expanded so now meets WP:GNG as well (sources 1, 3, 5 and weak for 4).  For transparency, I am the AfC reviewer who accepted the draft and did so based on NPROF.  S0091 (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above conversation, meets NPROF PigeonChickenFish (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. He meets WP:NPROF. Cullen328 (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and WP:SNOW close, as improved and clearly meeting the WP:GNG. BD2412  T 23:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. Twinkle1990 (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.