Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemmie Hooton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Clemmie Hooton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. 1 gnews hits and no evidence of multiple significant roles. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Come on, don't you know "Laura's Star"? I've added a couple of links including the one you found and the filmography. This would be too much effort for me to read and reformat the article (I'm just exploring AfD and I don't know anything about the matter) but I hope that'll be enough. Moscowconnection (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * As a result, I read it and divided the text into paragraphs for readability. Moscowconnection (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:ENT requires mulitple significant roles. Her other roles seem minor. LibStar (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Indeed, Laura's Star is a notable production. However, notability is not inherited.  As LibStar correctly states, Hooton either has to pass the GNG or the notability criteria of WP:ENT.  There is no evidence she does either.   Ravenswing  18:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Short career and lack of coverage indcate that this individual has not yet attained a level of notability required for an independent article. Her theater work can be verified, but WP:ENT and WP:GNG require more.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.