Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clermont Sans Fil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Clermont Sans Fil

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication this was ever notable and completely WP:UNSOURCED but given I don't know French, decided to AfD instead of PROD out of an abundance of caution. Allan Nonymous (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and France. Owen&times;  &#9742;  23:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: It is not correct to suggest that this is completely unsourced. It has no citations but the references section has four references 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean, the citations are WP:ABOUTSELF so, I didn't really count them. Allan Nonymous (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 09:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete There is only one source that could potentially be considered reliable for WP:NORG, but at this point it fails both WP:NORG and WP:GNG. No reliable hits online either.  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as per 's rationale. Though there is a list of four references, all four appear to come from the organization's own site and therefore cannot be considered RS's. ArkHyena (talk) 22:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Various websites mention Clermont-Ferrand, but nothing found about this wifi initiative. What's used for sourcing isn't enough, basically profiles of the org. Oaktree b (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "sources" listed as references appear to be republished pr items by the group itself, or various blog items. Oaktree b (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.