Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleva North America


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Cleva North America

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Loafiewa (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Added one reference [1] but the article need few more reliable references. Fifthapril (talk) 05:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The Chicago Tribune reference is the only one I see coming close to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * DElete' as lacking coverage. Not your siblings&#39; deletionist (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - except a post on Chicago Tribune, I couldn't find anything significant about this company. Haueirlan (talk) 09:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Even the Chicago Tribune source is not the WP:SIGCOV about Cleva that is required for WP:ORGCRIT. The source is based on a press release and WP:ORGCRIT says "Examples of dependent coverage that is not sufficient to establish notability: ... any material that is substantially based on such press releases even if published by independent source". Also, the article does not describe what is notable about the company. And I found no other independenat reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. -Lopifalko (talk) 07:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.