Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clichés used in business and industry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --MCB 07:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Clichés used in business and industry
Original Research. Inherently POV. Non-Encyclopedic Alex Bakharev 09:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Is WP:OR as there are no references. QuiteUnusual 09:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Kavadi carrier 10:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 10:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - useless list, original research. MER-C 12:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as all original research. TheRanger 14:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another unsourced cliche list. Danny Lilithborne 01:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep! I like lists and Wikipedia has been delete happy as of late and I fear that many contributor's hard work will discourage participants and will detract from our ability to catalog human knowledge, the purpose of an encyclopedia. Cheers, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Buzzword bingo Not OR, because I added fourteen references from a variety of technical journals, personnel journals, Wall Street Journal, and People citing phrases from the set used here and discussing the problem of management cliches as an impediment to effective communication with employees. Edison 04:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think we need this when we already have this much more comprehensive list: List of idioms in the English language. Ohconfucius 06:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.