Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff's Amusement Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 18:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Cliff&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Finishing nomination for User:Kolbybotka, who has placed his concerns on Talk:Cliff's Amusement Park. I personally have no opinion. Ansh666 18:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article needs work, but I think that the references demonstrate notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per ; the sources in the article demonstrate notability, and POV issues would be a matter of editing, not deletion. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - The others are correct. Sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG.  While Ansh was kind, starting an AfD just because another editor wrote in prose "it should not be on Wikipedia" is not reason to start an AfD.  Kolbybotka is an established editor and can start an AfD themselves if they wanted to.  --Oakshade (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per and  Pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.