Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 20:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Clifford Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:GNG fails, non-notable building in Hong Kong, no in-depth news and book coverage in English or in Chinese languages. wikipedia is not a directory nor a supplement of google map. Hong Kong had may be 10,000 such commercial buildings so it existed does not mean we need to create an article. We need real significant coverage on existing reliable source to allow wiki editor to summarize those source to write a tertiary source. Matthew hk (talk) 17:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Off-topic, here is the official directory of all the buildings of Hong Kong, that have over 1500 pages in PDF, it should have a line for non-notable or notable, otherwise 1500 pages of building name are potential articles. Matthew hk on public computer (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete No actual sources proving the notability of the building on Google. Only Yelp and websites telling about offices for rent. Not even as notable as the building with the same name in Singapore. Nova Crystallis   (Talk)  16:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with lack of sufficient notoriety. Kdm852 (talk) 02:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:NBUILD, nothing showing that this is significant amongst the 100s of similiar hong kong buildings. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication found that this commercial real estate complex is notable. Possible PROMO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Based on user talk page log, it seem a placeholder for Kou Hing Hong Scientific Supplies Ltd, which literally turn wikipedia as a webhost and a guide to house every step to locate their company. Matthew hk (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.