Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford G. Brody


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Clifford G. Brody

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article fails to address the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Searching Google News for "Edcomm Clifford Brody" only provides a limited selection of press releases and derivative articles. References in the current article are promotional or self published. I note that the article was created by single purpose accounts user:DSbs2009 and user:MeS2135, making it likely that this is a vanity résumé page. Ash (talk) 22:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Ash (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * comment-- the  Gsearches   without the middle initial at clifford Brody might or might not be   someone else: GNews Archive.    DGG''' ( talk ) 00:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete notability seems only as a founder of Banker's Academy, which seems a highly doubtful notability itself. And there's his business partner Linda Eagle, who should be discussed separately because she might possibly have some greater notability. I spotted no adequately 3rd party sources.    DGG ( talk ) 00:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as author of this page I have removed the section that is not considered to be journalistic. I think the CEO of a company is a reputable person and is considered notable due to his several published articles.
 * —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.0.120 (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2010
 * To avoid confusion please make such contributions from your original account name . Please note the guidance of WP:SPA and WP:SOCK which may apply if you continue to swap identities, particularly when contributing to discussions.—Ash (talk) 22:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This was a mistake, my apologies - I was not was not attempting to swap identities, merely got logged out of my account MeS2135 —Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete Existing sources do not show notability. A CEO does not inherit notability from their corporation. A large corporation is certainly going to generate enough RS for most CEO to become notable and that is our standard. That does not appear to be the case here. Miami33139 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- Ash (talk) 03:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm sure he's reputable, that does not make him notable. A few published articles doesn't meet the standard. Wine Guy   Talk  03:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.