Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate of Virginia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Virginia, but not delete. The only way to delete an article after a merger while still preserving GFDL is to merge the histories, which isn't easy. Deathphoenix ʕ 03:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Climate of Virginia
Tagged for speedy as worthless, which is harsh but arguably fair, however it's not a valid speedy criterion. This can be covered in Virginia well enough. Guy 10:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 11:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge then Delete per nom. Gwernol 11:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Virginia and then Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong (T 11:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete as above. Cain Mosni 11:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We can't merge and delete, it violates GFDL. Guy 11:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Virginia. It won't hurt to leave a redirect, even if the content is so minimal that the history is only arguably relevant. JPD (talk) 13:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It could also expand to the size of Climate of Missouri or greater, given this, this, this, and this. The article is a stub, and there's clearly scope for expansion. Keep. Uncle G 17:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Uncle G that this is a stub, and as such, I expanded it some. Check the new version before voting further. Keep and expand further. Alba 05:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand but it really needs to have a summary part in Virginia as well --plange 06:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I concur with that sentiment as well Alba 12:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it has potential, even if it is just a stub (though as a Virginian I'm not sure how much my vote counts) --Matthew 01:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.