Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate theory

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT.

The votes were 4 delete, 2 redirect, 2 keep. dbenbenn | talk 02:58, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Climate theory
Not encyclopedic JoJan 19:40, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Seems like utter nonsense to me. Can this be speedied? Katefan0 21:57, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. - Jpo 00:51, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research, bordering on patent nonsense. Alphax (t) (c) (e) 02:28, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu. It's mentioned in that article. Megan1967 02:57, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename (and disambiguate) or delete. The term 'Climate theory' is much more often used in the context of weather, meteorology, and climate change than to refer to the good Baron's theory.  Perhaps a disambiguation page at this title, with appropriate links to climate, weather, and psychology topics?  I fear that a plain redirect would not take most people where they wanted to go.  If there is a substantial amount to be said on the topic then move this article to Climate theory (psychology) or something similar.  Otherwise it can quite happily exist as a section within the Baron of Montesquieu's article. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 16:50, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur Kappa 19:22, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Megan1967 is correct. This is neither original research nor patent nonsense.  It is the discredited theory of a historical figure. I'm not sure it deserves an independent article, however.  The current content is completely redundant with the section in Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu's article.  Given that it is discredited, I don't know what could be added. I'm inclined to redirect for now.  Future editors can turn it into a disambiguation page when they need it later.  Right now, nothing from "what links here" points back to any meteorology topic. Rossami (talk) 22:47, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.