Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climeon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  08:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Climeon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Sourcing available is either non-reliable sourcing in the form of blogs, press releases, or recycled press releases by trade publications. Delete per failing WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Lots of good sources. ie. Company Information (In Swedish), Its also on bloomberg.comThere is also a video of Richard Branson talking about the company Here HDavis2017 (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HDavis2017 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, these sources are simply listings that show the company exist and a marketing video by the company itself. Those sources are not what we require to be notable under our guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Several articles about the company, and it appears to meet WP:GNG. It won the ”Technology Innovation Award” awarded by Frost & Sullivan, article in Dagens Industri, a major Swedish financial newspaper. Listed as one of Sweden's hottest startups in new technology by Ny Teknik and Affärsvärlden. Winner of the E-Prize, an energy award by Veckans Affärer and E.ON. There's also a number of news articles:    and many more. Sjö (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning toward delete. This page is based on sources that are primary, an advertisement, or do not even mention the subject of the page. Yes, the company won an award, but is it anything significant? This is difficult to tell because the sources are written as an advertisement ("100% pure electricity", etc.). My very best wishes (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- advertorially toned and lack of notability. The article exists solely to promote the company, as in:
 * In 2015 Viking Line installed a pilot Climeon Ocean for a test period.[6]
 * In 2016 Virgin Voyages announced a partnership with Climeon and the use of the Climeon Ocean on three of their cruise ships.[7]
 * In 2016 SSAB installed a Climeon system for a pilot run. The system is supposed to save 1 to 1.5 million kWh per year!
 * Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete There doesn't appear to be any reference that meet the criteria for establishing notability - fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 16:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.