Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical Knowledge Network (CKN)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Clinical Knowledge Network (CKN)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article appears to be promotional, and the subject is not (from what I can tell) notable. longchess (talk · contribs · block user) 23:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. longchess (talk · contribs · block user) 23:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. longchess (talk · contribs · block user) 23:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I doubt it is promotional. The wording of what little there is in the article isn't overtly promotional.  I can find no coverage in independent reliable sources.  As best I can tell, this is an intranet site for Queensland Health based on this.  I suppose one might merge to Queensland Health, but does it really make sense for an intranet site to be in that article?  My own editorial judgement on that is no. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable per above. ♟♙ (talk) 15:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.