Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Hickman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Clint Hickman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Minimally sourced WP:BLPs of three people notable only for serving at the county level of government. This is not a level of office for which someone gets an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL just because he exists, but none of the articles is actually sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 12:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 12:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete articles on local politicians lacking adequate sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  13:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep From the number and the reliability of the sources themselves, I suggest keeping it, but label it as a stub. Thank you. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the article. The subject seems to met a minimum criteria of WP:GNG. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Striking vote of blocked user, who was only participating at AfD to make a point. Brad  v  04:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. The only marginal claims of notability in the article are in the lede, which is unsourced. The references given in the article are mostly opinion pieces or only mention the subject in passing. Brad  v  20:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL. Local politician with only routine local coverage. MB 22:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.