Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Weiler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Clint Weiler

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page appears to be blatant self-promotion - the links do not verify the subject's independent notability beyond work with his clients.TheNate (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is such a blatantly obvious attempt at promotion that I'm surprised that nobody has tried to speedy it. I went through the sources in the article and none of them are usable. The vast majority of them are press releases by Weiler that only mention his name or contact pages, with the rest being articles that either don't mention him at all or are just the briefest of briefest mentions. A search for Weiler brings up nothing that would show that he has any notability. He might have some brushes with notable people, but notability is not inherited or given to Weiler through this association.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.