Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinton hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles (talk) 01:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Clinton Hill (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

PROD-contested article was written by author with a potential COI. May not meet notability guidelines per WP:BIO.  elektrik SHOOS  17:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Artist is subject of sufficient publications. Artist is not a living person, therefore this article is not an example of blatant sales spam. When an artist passes from the world of the living, let the art historians do their work... Carrite (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep He exhibited at MoMA, Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Smithsonian and others and the list of publications easily establishes notability. The article needs references and general clean-up.  freshacconci  talk talk  23:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, the article needs work and should have been titled Clinton Hill (artist), which it is now...Modernist (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Exhibitions history and publications available establish notability.  Ty  18:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 07:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Lots of sources. He seems like a significant artist Vartanza (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.