Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClipboardMultiSharer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

ClipboardMultiSharer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication at all as to why this is important. No sources, third-party coverage, or relevant search results. It doesn't read like WP:ADVERT, but this may be the intent of the page. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I've enhanced the article along the lines suggested above. Now it contains more information about the utility as well as having more pointers to relevant concepts/information. I believe at this point it does convey some useful information, but it's after all still about that particular utility, and how important the article (ie. is it important enough) is another matter of judgement. Sorry if I wasted anybody's time here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Behcet (talk • contribs) 22:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. No independent sourcing attesting to notability. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.