Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipping path service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Clipping path. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Clipping path service

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Essentially spam, by a promoter of a company that supplies such a service. Unsourced, and apparently nonnotable as a concept. Dicklyon (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) If unfortunately, any information is or are related to show a company promotion, please delete this information in the article. As the new comer writer I have no any company promotion intention in the article -saiful_9999 Most probably Clipping Path Specialist and Clipping Path India references are making problem as a spam article. So I have deleted the links from External Link.
 * Redirect article to Clipping path; not sure there's anything else in the article worth preserving. -- Jayron  32  06:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Jayron32 -  Dwayne   was here!   &#9835;  06:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per saiful_9999 - There was no clear indication in the article that the article contents are bearing to promote a company promotion

saiful_9999-Exist article “Clipping path” in the wikipedia is basically provided us definition type information on clipping path. On the other hand, the article “Clipping path service” is necessary in the wikipedia to know about the importance of clipping path service in the digital world and the exit article of clipping path service is written by informative information. So, in my view, the article should not be considered for deletion. The article can be edited or improved instant of deletion. I think this will be wise decision. —Preceding undated comment added 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC).
 * redirect as per others. Although not promoting any one firm it's written like advertising copy, and although this could be fixed the entire topic is non-notable, much as "car washing sevice" or "shoe repair service" would be. No need for an article.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 16:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. I'm not sure the concept per se is unnotable. Given the high number of companies providing such services and the fact that it is not obvious that companies are outsourcing such services, I tend to think there can be said something about it within an article like that. Please note that the clipping path article does not address this aspect, so if you're suggesting a redirect the fact that there are services providing this needs to be mentioned in that article (probably best as a single concise(!) section). Of course, the current state of this article is unacceptable, full of broken verbiage and original research. Nageh (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.