Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clitoral-vaginal index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Clitoral-vaginal index

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N. Google search shows 23 ghits, but no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Scholar shows only one paper on this, but that is not multiple and not significant coverage.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 08:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The nominator says it all, some results, but not enough of them. —Atyndall &#91;citation needed&#93; 08:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I created this article as it was on the list of Articles requested for over a year or two years, or something. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Pending reliable sources. Black-Velvet  10:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - for a geocities reference this is one of the best I've seen yet, but the topic still doesn't seem to be used outside that one book? --Amalthea (talk) 20:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, the nominator says it all. Forego (talk) 00:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.