Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clock Crew

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 04:17, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Clock Crew
Non notable internet group, the dead hompage is a testament to their non-notability--nixie 01:05, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Zzyzx11 02:13, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. We cannot include articles on internet groups which are now closed. (See below for why this is struck out. Sjakkalle 07:49, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC))
 * Keep I would say it is notable, because it is from a very well known site with 1000's of members. (This vote was submitted by 206.75.182.82).
 * Delete. We cannot include articles on internet groups which are now closed. This was my vote, and somebody, 206.75.182.82, has replaced that with a keep vote (stricken out above). I assert that my vote is, and always has been, delete on this (if you do not believe this, check the history). I suggest that the administrator who handles this debate give the anon who altered my vote a warning that such behavior on a vfd-debate is not acceptable. Sjakkalle 07:36, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, I think now that this was an honest mistake, my original delete vote I see is above the stricken out vote which was signed with my name. The keep vote was made by 206.75.182.82, and should be counted as one. Sjakkalle 07:49, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Android79 17:07, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * I am all but certain that this has been deleted in the distant past. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:27, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. If it was deleted in the past, that's grounds for speedying. Radiant! 16:39, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no independent verifiability - David Gerard 17:43, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: Anyone been to ClockCrew.net recently? The Clock Crew is still very much alive and it has always been a phenomenon. Considering there are still Clocks posting on Newgrounds today, that the Clocks have influenced the creation of many groups and crazes, and that Wikipedia has documented far lesser known fads, I think this is a piece of history that should remain in the archives.
 * This vote by Smoddy (tgec) 21:57, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.