Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clock tower association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Complete lack of reliable sources is a strong argument for deletion. If the creator or someone else would like the article to be userfied so they can work on it, leave a message at my talk page. Hut 8.5 16:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Clock tower association

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable university organization. I was unable to find Googlenews hits for this organization, tho if 'Clock tower association' is an English translation of the organizations name I could see the issue. Page creator shares a name with the 'Patron in Chief' of the organization. Syrthiss (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I am cautious about deleting foriegn not-for-profits, especially when it may just be weak article writing at fault, but I struggle to see necessary notability. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone who speaks that language will have to search for information. No way to tell one way or the other until that happens.   D r e a m Focus  17:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 19:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * delete Sources or gone. It's the creator's problem to address this. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The description is so generic that it's not even possible to tell what the organization does. "The main objective of organization was coordination with the students and provision of support"? With no sources, others can't help improve this article. Anything here worth keeping can be added to HITEC University. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Suspend The article is under creation and it is not completed, You can suspend it temporarily so that it go online after the resolution of your issues. It is correct that I am founder of this organization but that doesn't mean I created it for advertisement only. If so then you can ask me to remove those portion containing information about me. It was started just as a student organization within a University but now it is spreading in other universities of Pakistan i.e. UET and IIUI. The other objection that it hasen't authentic references is correct but it was not having online resources. I will upload the resources and then add their reference for review. Nisar Ahmed Rana 00:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisar Ahmed Rana (talk • contribs)
 * Suspend Suspend the AfD while the article is completed. Some of the objections have already been corrected, and other problems might well be corrected in the near term. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As the page is new and continuously building (Last edit was made on December 23) therefore, I think creator should give time to improve the page. As far as organization is concerned, being a student of HITEC University Taxila Cantt, I've seen this organization's contribution towards co-curricular activities which is I think superb because university is new, Organization is new and they are doing tremendous job and building the future of nation. Za zealot (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * They've had a month and there are no external references. The idea of "time to finish copywriting" is reasonable, if this were a question of quality, but the issue here is that there's no external sourcing. It doesn't take long to fix that, if it's fixable. As it hasn't been done, my suspicion is that it can't and won't be done, no matter how long we leave it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Suspend The article is still under creation. It is not fair to the author to delete this. It is also a remarkable organisation that deserves recognition on Wikipedia. --Rubinkumar (talk) 23:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.