Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockwork (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sam Raimi. I've referenced it at Sam Raimi and have redirected this there. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Clockwork (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Unsourced and has been a stub since 31 January 2007. Sources found in search results turn up empty. Mysticair667537 (talk) 00:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 21.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per nominator. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, as pointed out. Seems like an unnotable film with no sources online to back it up. QueerFilmNerd  talk 05:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect To Sam Raimi. I have a found a few scant mentions of the film, but nothing that comes close to be substantial enough to support a stand alone article.  However, I think a redirect to Raimi's article would be be appropriate.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.