Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockwork Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Clockwork Recordings

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Exists, but the 3 sole gnews/gbooks hits are insufficient to supply the multiple, non-passing, substantial RS coverage that warrants a stand-alone article. Tagged for notability and zero refs since May. Epeefleche (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Zero references except for own website etc.; no indication of wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 02:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject lacks any coverage whatsoever in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  20:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.