Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockwork Storybook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  23:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Clockwork Storybook
I'm not sure; 497 Google hits seems low, especially for a website. I don't know; I figure I'd see what people thought. Abstain. Maxamegalon2000 05:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn website with "a small but loyal fanbase" that was shut down five years ago. Doubt it would have passed WP:WEB even then. Fan1967 05:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Fan-1967. Reyk
 * Keep google search for "willingham" and "clockwork storybook" together seems to indicate some level of notability. Willingham himself is apparently somewhat notable, and has a wikipedia entry (which was worked on by several different users, not just one dedicated loon).  "clockwork storybook" apparently is also the name of a related publishing company...or something.  Really not too clear.  However, 401 google hits for "willingham" and "clockwork storybook" together (492 for "clockwork storybook" alone, 166,000 for "bill willingham" alone) seems to be sufficient for notability. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 05:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Just because the guy is notable doesn't mean that every single enterprise he was ever involved in is notable. I don't find any mention of Clockwork Storybook in his WP article or anywhere on his own website. The Ghits I find for it all appear to date from the late 90's. Fan1967 06:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I didn't check the dates on the hits.  Changing my vote to delete Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 07:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Fan1967... historical application of WP:WEB applies. -- Kinu t /c  07:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, but a merge wouldn't bother me either. --kingboyk 08:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. You said it. ProhibitOnions 11:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Newyorktimescrossword 07:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn website. Mukadderat 18:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.