Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clone Kitty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Clone Kitty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG. There are no independent sources and searching does not find independent coverage. Written by a WP:SPA, possible G11. MB 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. MB 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT (and authorship) but I'm not sure about the question of notability. The sources currently present in the article that I checked were either unreliable or not independent. Ovinus (talk) 14:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of GNG. Even with primary sources, huge chunks of the article are unsourced, and it reads far more emotional than is acceptable for an encyclopedia article. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an easy call. No sources and not notable. This article should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 00:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.