Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clontarf church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, valid redirect. Yes, there is a potential for more than one topic, but until such articles are created, this does not need to be a dab page with only one entry. Leave as redirect for now, convert to dab if articles on other churches in Clontarf are written.  AK Radecki  16:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Clontarf church

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This "article" and a number more, all of which relate to multiple potential topics, appears to have been created only to be a redirect to one such topic, which has its own article and is findable in search. Clontarf has at least 6 churches, belonging to at least four different denominations. SeoR 16:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Disambg no need for deletion. Whsitchy 16:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I could buy that, although it does not apply to say, C of i, another of this set, at all - but there was no ambiguity to be disambiguated. 217.213.100.112 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Concern is simple, should redirects be created to "capture" users searching for a general term, such as "C of i", which could have many other meanings, or a term like "Clontarf Protestants", when the area has many communities of Protestants, and en masse (some seem valid but were they needed?, the search engine finds the page anyway); some examples:

08:40, 24 May 2007 C of i (←Redirected page to Clontarf Church of Ireland) 08:35, 24 May 2007 Clontarf protestants (←Redirected page to Clontarf Church of Ireland) 08:35, 24 May 2007 Clontarf protestant (←Redirected page to Clontarf Church of Ireland) 08:34, 24 May 2007 Clontarf protestant church (←Redirected page to Clontarf Church of Ireland

If I, and others, misunderstand and this is a valid way to use redirects, fine. SeoR 16:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they appear to fit the same pattern:

I will leave it at that, will go do other editing later. SeoR 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.