Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closed.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Closed.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Closed. is another Facebook group that somebody made a Wikipedia page for. It has no references, nor does it a large following save a few Facebook users, and no media coverage or significance of any kind whatsoever. I recommend a speedy deletion per WP:NN. Another-anomaly (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * KEEPClosed., while only a Group on Facebook, is large enough and growing fast enough to be newsworthy in short order. IT currently has had no media exposure, but has 400,000+ members and is growing at a rate of ~60 people per minute.  There are other articles devoted to viral phenomenon on wikipedia, chocolate rain for instance, and there is no reason that this should be any exception.  I am the creator of this wikipedia page, as well as the current admin of the CLOSED. Facebook group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotzur (talk • contribs) 03:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Chocolate rain has been covered by major news outlets due it's Youtube view count and references in other media, like most sustained Internet phenomenons. If the same happens to Closed., then the article will be due to be written(hopefully by someone other than the group administrator per WP:NN) but until then it is not by a long shot notable enough for Wikipedia inclusion. You also may wish to sign your posts with ~ at the end. Another-anomaly (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not meet any of the criteria for web content per WP:WEB. --Rudimae (talk) 04:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not notable: no coverage, obviously not an inherently notable topic, and clearly a COI. Nyttend (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-promotion. WillOakland (talk) 06:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability in the Wikipedia sense of the word. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero notability --Numyht (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. -- samj in out 16:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No coverage, so inherently non-notable, failing WP:WEB. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. T-95 (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. Why wait?— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  20:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.