Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloudBusiness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

CloudBusiness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reviewed through NPP. Article on a software company referenced to random no-name websites and primary sources, nothing better to be found through WP:BEFORE. Closest thing to a claim of notability here is that it was a finalist (not a winner!) in a non-notable app competition. Decisive failure of WP:NCORP. See also Synder App. Spicy (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom — {Cryptic  Canadian}  01:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - references taken from primarily sources on accounting software (Insightful Accountant, Intuit Developer, XU Magazine). The company has also won a grandprize at a large hackathon sponsored by Intuit - a major accounting software developer. Argument for notability within the accounting software ecosystem. Primary sources taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seabreeze44 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the topic does not seem to meet WP:NCORP criteria. The article does cite a number of sources, but some are unreliable and others do not constitute the in-depth, independence coverage required by NCORP. SamHolt6 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Winning and being a finalist in a couple of niche app competitions does not translate into notability here, falling under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Aside from these competitions, the provided references are a couple of product how-to reviews - again not translating into notability for the developing company. Searches are not finding better; fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 06:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - added Business Insider and Yahoo Finance sources (1.5 Million dollars processed) User talk:Seabreeze44 —Preceding undated comment added 11:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Your further comments are welcome in this discussion, but please do not add multiple keep/delete opinions. Also, Yahoo Finance and Business Insider are both labelled as a PR Newswire press release, not WP:RS coverage. AllyD (talk) 11:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * User talk:Seabreeze44 Thank you, I didn't know! I thought that the high source validity would add validity to even a press release. —Preceding undated comment added 11:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Just FYI, the criteria for establishing notability is not simply whether the source is reliable/valid/high profile/etc but also includes whether the *content* is *independent*. Please read WP:ORGIND for an explanation.  HighKing++ 13:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.