Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clout News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Clout News

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Start-up website is not yet notable. I couldn't find any references other than the ones in the article, which consist of a paragraph in a profile of the owner, an article written by a Clout News writer, and an article in RESPECT which is very similar to the Clout News writer's article, both containing hand-wavy claims of "traffic" and "growth" with no real specifics (both read more like planted press than serious coverage to me). Schazjmd  (talk)  23:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Schazjmd   (talk)  23:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom, as not notable.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.