Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloverETL (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salting can be requested at WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

CloverETL
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete and Salt please given this is nearly essentially the same thing from the 1st AfD aside from a few changes so there's seriously nothing of actual significance, substance and convincing, and with searches literally finding nothing at all, that's not beneficial news for this company given it's a explosive advertisement, having been restarted not even a year past the first AfD (article restarted in June 2013!) and has been heavily contributed to by quickly-coming-and-going accounts which of course apparently have no other focused articles than this one, which says enough by itself. SwisterTwister  talk  18:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete basic BEFORE turns up only press releases and passing mentions for me - David Gerard (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article created by one and subsequently extended by another WP:SPA account since the previous AfD deletion. The given references are routine announcements, integration notes and blog reviews - sufficient to verify the product but not to establish its notability, nor are the couple of items covered in the previous AfD. My own searches are not finding anything better; clear evidence of utilisation but not meeting Notability_(software) or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete & salt -- blatant corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.