Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloverleaf (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Cloverleaf (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article creator contested PROD. The sourcing that is extant about this subject is either a failure of WP:CORPDEPTH, from your standard trade publications that lack reliability for establishing notability, or are press release/promotional based and thus excluded as counting towards notability per WP:SPIP. Unlike most of these type of AfD nominations, I actually think the subject is an interesting concept, but it still fails our standards for inclusion. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete no claim of meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- 100% promo article with trivial content such as:
 * "Cloverleaf has filed multiple patent applications and was granted its first patent (9,576,174) in February 2017!"
 * Etc. Such articles are explicitly excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. In any case, it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia article here. Sources are regular suspects: self-promotion, interviews, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.