Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloves syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Moves should be discussed here. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Cloves syndrome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Was listed for speedy delete "copyvio of http://www.clovessyndromefoundation.org/ and related pages", but "the life of our daughter" in the original article text seems to show that the same person uploaded the same text to Wikipedia and http://www.clovessyndromefoundation.org/ . I have changed the article from an appeal to neutrally descriptive text. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  23:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Two of the references, seemingly neutral, document the syndrome's existence. Glad the article has been reworded. Tapered (talk) 00:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, actually a pretty interesting disease. Needs improved sourcing but there are reasonable reviews available. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article could definitely be improved, but the topic is legitimate and the current text is better than no article at all. Looie496 (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Move to CLOVES syndrome? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, a move to this title would seem appropriate, but this is not the place to discuss moves, only notability. Everymorning   talk  17:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Simply because a medical condition is rare is not a valid reason for deletion. Channel 5 (UK) very recently ran a documentary about CLOVES that played throughout the UK. As more is known about this condition and more people turn to Wikipedia for information, the article can be improved. Siberian Husky (talk) 03:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Nicely sourced. AlbinoFerret  16:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.