Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown Heaven and Hell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Me Mom and Morgentaler as no one is opposing that. (non-admin closure)  J 947 ( c ) (m)   19:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Clown Heaven and Hell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Full disclosure: I'm the original creator here, at a different time in Wikipedia's history: once upon a time, all the notability that an album or EP actually had to show was the fact that it was recorded by a notable band. But WP:NMUSIC has been tightened up in the intervening decade, and an album or EP now has to meet higher standards of independent notability in its own right to warrant a standalone article. But this was actually an independent demo cassette, not a label release, so it got no significant reliable source coverage at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to respective musician, because its a plausible search term., if you're the creator and deletion nominator, and virutally no one in its decade of existence edited it, why don't you just boldly redirect and be done? Sergecross73   msg me  16:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It has been edited by other people in the intervening decade. You're free to disagree about whether their edits were genuinely substantive enough to forestall me being able to arbitrarily invoke G7 speedy, but my own reading was that there were enough edits by other people that I can't. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That's correct about a speedy delete, but I didn't mean that, I was just talking about WP:BOLDly redirecting. Technically, any editor can redirect any article if they want to (assuming they have a good-faith rationale.) Technically, discussion is only necessary if someone opposes the action.My point about no one else editing the article was just that you'd very unlikely to find any opposition to the redirect, considering very few ever edited it at all over the course of an entire decade.  Sergecross73   msg me  17:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Me Mom and Morgentaler § Discography; a valid search term per WP:ATD-R. Not finding source coverage to qualify a standalone article. North America1000 08:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.